Laura Akers" />
Psycho Drive-In logo
Search
  • PDI Press
    Featured
    • BETTY WHITE VS THE STUPID WORLD: The Movie

      Laura Akers
      January 17, 2022
      Fiction, PDI Press, PDI Press Writers
    Recent
    • BETTY WHITE VS THE STUPID WORLD: The Movie

      John E. Meredith
      January 17, 2022
    • Betty White Vs the Stupid World (Chapter Seven)

      John E. Meredith
      January 16, 2022
    • Betty White Vs the Stupid World (Chapter Six)

      John E. Meredith
      January 15, 2022
    • PDI Press Catalog
    • PDI Press Writers
      • Fiction
  • Columns A-D
    • A Fistful of Dollar Comics
    • ABCs of Horror
    • All Binge… No Purge
    • Anything Joes
    • Beautiful Creatures
    • Big Eyes Smart Mouth
    • Big Sleeps and Long Goodbyes
    • Cahiers du Horror
    • Dispatches From the Field
    • Drive-In Saturday
    • Dungeons & D-Listers
  • Columns F-P
    • The Final Girl
    • First Looks… Second Thoughts
    • The Flesh is Weak
    • Innocence and Experience
    • Lost in Translation
    • Page to Screen
    • Popcorn Cinema
    • Psycho Essentials: The ’80s!
  • Columns S-Z
    • Schlock & Awe
    • Shakespeare on Film
    • Shot for Shot
    • Sick Flix
    • Unnatural Selections
    • Versus
    • Video Word Made Flesh
    • We Got Lists
    • Women in Horror
    • The Xeno File
    • Zombies 101
  • Reviews
    Featured
    • X (2022)

      Laura Akers
      April 22, 2022
      Movies, Reviews
    Recent
    • X (2022)

      Nate Zoebl
      April 22, 2022
    • Everything Everywhere All At Once (2022)

      Nate Zoebl
      April 15, 2022
    • The Adam Project (2022)

      Nate Zoebl
      March 16, 2022
    • Books
    • Comics
    • DVD/Blu-ray
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Series
  • Interviews
    Featured
    • Interview with Indie Horror Master, Chris Bickel

      Laura Akers
      July 13, 2018
      Interviews
    Recent
    • Interview with Indie Horror Master, Chris Bickel

      The Final Girl
      July 13, 2018
    • David Black: Carnies, Carnage, and the Creative Chaos of Darkness Visible

      Dan Lee
      March 7, 2017
    • Jaiden Kaine joins the Marvel Universe as new Luke Cage baddie, Zip

      Andre Lamar
      September 29, 2016
    • SDCC 2016 Interviews: The Cast and Creators of Batman: The Killing Joke

      Jason Sacks
      July 28, 2016
    • SDCC 2016 Interviews: The Cast and Creators of Syfy’s Van Helsing

      Dave Hearn, Paul Brian McCoy
      July 27, 2016
    • Wondercon Interview: The Cast of Damien

      Gary Richardson, Laura Akers
      April 16, 2016
  • News
    Featured
    • John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum arrives on Digital 8/23 and 4K Ultra HD, Blu-ray, DVD and On Demand 9/10

      Laura Akers
      July 30, 2019
      DVD/Blu-ray, News
    Recent
    • John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum arrives on Digital 8/23 and 4K Ultra HD, Blu-ray, DVD and On Demand 9/10

      psychodr
      July 30, 2019
    • X-Men: Dark Phoenix arrives on Digital 9/3 and 4K Ultra HD, Blu-ray and DVD 9/17

      Paul Brian McCoy
      July 16, 2019
    • Avengers: Endgame arrives on Digital 7/30 and Blu-ray 8/13

      psychodr
      July 16, 2019
    • Trailers
  • Psychos
  • Merchandise
Breaking
  • X (2022)
  • Everything Everywhere All At Once (2022)
  • The Adam Project (2022)
  • The Batman (2022)
  • Entropy (2022)
  • Killer Sofa (2019)
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Who We Be
  • Contact
  • PDI Press
    • PDI Press Catalog
    • PDI Press Writers
      • Fiction
  • Columns A-D
    • A Fistful of Dollar Comics
    • ABCs of Horror
    • All Binge… No Purge
    • Anything Joes
    • Beautiful Creatures
    • Big Eyes Smart Mouth
    • Big Sleeps and Long Goodbyes
    • Cahiers du Horror
    • Dispatches From the Field
    • Drive-In Saturday
    • Dungeons & D-Listers
  • Columns F-P
    • The Final Girl
    • First Looks… Second Thoughts
    • The Flesh is Weak
    • Innocence and Experience
    • Lost in Translation
    • Page to Screen
    • Popcorn Cinema
    • Psycho Essentials: The ’80s!
  • Columns S-Z
    • Schlock & Awe
    • Shakespeare on Film
    • Shot for Shot
    • Sick Flix
    • Unnatural Selections
    • Versus
    • Video Word Made Flesh
    • We Got Lists
    • Women in Horror
    • The Xeno File
    • Zombies 101
  • Reviews
    • Books
    • Comics
    • DVD/Blu-ray
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Series
  • Interviews
  • News
    • Trailers
  • Psychos
  • Merchandise
Home
Reviews

Sherlock 4.00 “The Abominable Bride”

Laura Akers
January 19, 2016
Reviews, TV

My love of Sherlock Homes started out all wrong, I’ll admit it. When I was eleven, my family just barely had enough money to rent a two-bedroom house for the seven of us, so as you can imagine, there wasn’t a lot of cash for entertainment. And television wasn’t an option because we didn’t have a set. But my parents were resourceful people, and in addition to nightly storytimes, my siblings and I were soon introduced to a wonder of a bygone era: the local public radio station broadcast radio dramas several nights a week. And so, evenings were spent drinking milky tea, and shushing each other as we gathered around the radio to listen to Inner Sanctum, The Shadow, a host of now-forgotten detective mysteries, and the one that would forever stick: Basil Rathbone’s Sherlock Homes.

From there of course, my love took a more orthodox turn as I began to devour the original stories by Sir Arthur Conan-Doyle on my own, which Mom also began to read to us. But there was still a bit of perversity in my approach. As soon as I had access to a TV and TV Guide, I would scour it for anything Sherlockian. Rathbone’s WWII Holmes, Nicholas Meyers’ psychoanalyzed Sherlock, Billy Wilder’s more risqué detective—I watched them all with a sort of weird equanimity, even embracing the silliness of the late arrival Young Sherlock Holmes.

It is likely this strange mixed-genre introduction that kept me from being much of a purist when it came to Sherlock Holmes. Rathbone would always be model of the man for me, but my exposure to the books made me loathe the bumbling of Nigel Bruce. I was equally at ease with the idea of Moriarty as a bonafide supervillain and as a monster created out of Oedipal conflict. And the question of whether Irene Adler was ever actually loved by Sherlock was one that for me could be endlessly asked because there was no right answer.

sherlock-holmes-basil-rathbone

So when the series Sherlock started in 2010, I was more than ready for the direction in which Mark Gatiss and Stephen Moffat took the detective and his world. In fact, the update made perfect sense to me in a lot of ways. Conan-Doyle’s Sherlock had been on the cutting edge of forensic science (if not astronomy) and technique in his day. So of course a contemporary Holmes would not bother to clutter his beautiful attic/mind-palace with data; he would instead master the technological tools available to him to quickly access what he needed when he needed it. He would not be a sexist relic; people either interest or annoy Holmes regardless of gender, so Donovan’s sin isn’t that she’s a woman—it’s that she’s inept (or, normal, rather) and foolish enough to waste herself on Anderson. He would not smoke a pipe, let alone something as ridiculous as a Calabash pipe (the one he’s always depicted as smoking but never did in the original stories); I’ve lived in London, and while you can theoretically sustain a smoking habit there, it’s damned difficult and would be seen as silly if it involved a pipe, minus the weed, of course. And yes, two men in their mid-thirties sharing a flat would raise more than a few eyebrows, especially when one of them has no interest in women and the other cannot seem to sustain an interest for more than a few weeks.

And it wasn’t just that Gatiss/Moffat made interesting decisions in how to adapt Sherlock to the 21st century, or even that they were also smart ones. It was that those decisions actively made even those of us who were purists rethink who Sherlock was once you completely stripped away or inverted or otherwise questioned the things around him that we thought of us inseparably Sherlock. Gatiss and Moffat could only do this because, as uber-fans of the stories and adaptations themselves, this is what they themselves had done—stripped him down. Hence Sherlock became more than just an adaptation of those stories; in a sense it was a crucible in which, by changing Holmes, we learned what was unchangeable—what was essentially him—and thus equally at home in any moment in time.

Not that the two had no fun in this effort. Quite the opposite. Part of what has made Sherlock such a joy is the sense of the mischievous that they’ve brought to their adaptation—whether in the form of sly asides to the original Conan-Doyle stories or the biting but affectionate chemistry in the dialogue between series regulars. They remember that Holmes was a bit of a Loki, a prankster who pulled all manner of tricks on people for the sheer pleasure of seeing them surprised or confounded or just levelled. And time and time again this has been their own modus operandi with us, culminating once in “The Reichenbach Fall/The Empty Hearse” where we watched both Moriarty and Holmes die (and the latter live again) and now, in “The Abominable Bride” where events of those earlier episodes are reconsidered.

412908-new-way-of-deduction

Or is it later episode? Set in Conan-Doyle’s original London of the 1890’s, “The Abominable Bride” should give us a Sherlock that feels more familiar. It is no small measure of the success of the Gatiss/Moffat that this is not actually true. Their superlative rebranding of the detective has been so thorough that it feels odd not to see Benedict Cumberbatch’s Sherlock enveloped in the great Belstaff coat, swiping at imaginary Minority Report-like images in the air. The smoking jacket, the hansom cabs, the gas lighting are now suddenly, weirdly, alien to us.

What is not new is so many of the exchanges, especially those in the first half hour of the episode. At first, it seems a strange decision to recraft, for a second time, such seminal moments in Sherlock lore—the first meeting between Holmes and Watson being the most stark example. My husband, watching over my shoulder, asked with some annoyance, “Are they just going to do the entire first episode over?” Which, like many of Watson’s comments, was quite clever in its ignorance. Not being a fan of the character himself, the hubby wasn’t fooled for a minute into thinking we were seeing moments from the original stories redone—because he had no context for those, having never read them. Instead, he sussed out that those thirty minutes were all about rewriting this version of the Holmes legend. Setting the stage not for any Sherlock, but for this Sherlock specifically.

Moffat’s particular cleverness in dealing with his audience is rather breathtaking, whether he directs it at Doctor Who fans or Sherlock ones. There is always more than a bit of the Loki, the Holmes, in anything he lets slip about these two projects, so it was hardly surprising that going into “The Abominable Bride,” despite the fact that fans had been privy to a rather breathtaking number of what might otherwise seem like spoilerific on-set photos and the news that the episode would be set in Victorian London, we still had no idea what we were watching for most of the episode. Where did this fit in the canon of Sherlock?  What was this stage being set for?

hudson1

The answer, as always, takes us back both to the original and into that Sherlock canon in a way that makes perfect, brilliant sense. While CBS’s Elementary made Holmes’ drug use/abuse a central issue in their story, Gatiss/Moffat largely brought it up only as a red herring (the nicotine patches) and to dismiss it. Re-introducing it here and complicating it by making it less an escape for Sherlock and more an investigative tool (assuming you buy Holmes’s rationalization over Mycroft’s more cynical insinuations) is almost shocking simply because they had already convinced us to stop thinking of the character of Holmes as anything as commonplace as a substance addict despite it being such established lore.

To then base an entire episode on it? This is why this property could not be in better hands.

The shift to Victorian England, despite the intentional jarring it was meant to evoke, gave us another aspect of the series that always works so well. The 1890’s stage is beautiful, rich in detail, and shifts our characters into another world, but a believable one for the people we’ve grown to love on Sherlock. Mrs. Hudson may corseted tight in her long gown, but she is no less the devoted but slightly disgruntled mother-figure we love, reminding the boys “I’m your landlady, not a plot device.” Lestrade, his “regulation tread” on the staircase announcing his arrival on the doorstep of his acknowledged investigative superior. And Mary—amazing Mary—working as a spy for brother Mycroft in aid of their non-specific friend England.

Even in the one place where a character is remarkably changed, the way it is done fits the clever tone of the series, and here you must forgive me a bit of a ‘shipper tangent.

Molly-Facial-Hair

Molly Hooper in Watson-recognized drag is a great transgressive moment if you know a bit about the fandom. The question of what to do with the mousy pathologist would have been a difficult one for the writers since, although there were female physicians in Victorian England, a woman running the morgue would not have been acceptable. So gender-swapping her might seem like an easy if a bit silly answer. And Louise Brealey certainly handles drag-Hooper well, clearly enjoying the change.

Gatiss and Moffat have, of course, played with the Hooper/Holmes relationship, and the fans’ embracing of it, giving us the rather amazing kiss that really wasn’t in “The Empty Hearse.” The fact that the audience is supposed to know that there’s nothing going on romantically between Sherlock and Watson (while almost everyone on the other side of the fourth wall assumes there is) has not stopped a legion of fans from writing volumes of fanfiction about just such a relationship, thereby setting up a possible fan conflict between those who see Watson as the detective’s soul mate and those who feel that place is reserved for Molly.

Except this isn’t what has happened. Not only is there no conflict, there’s little difference. Authors shift back and forth between the two paramours and, more interestingly, don’t. The Sherlock/John/Molly triad is a well-established subgenre and one in which Watson is often the emotional bridge between Molly and Sherlock—helping the detective to understand what she needs from the relationship. So when Gatiss and Moffat reconfigure the dynamic between the three, while it appears that they are creating a romantic obstacle between Molly and Sherlock by making her livelihood dependent on maintaining a male identity (and theoretically making her less accessible), they actually make a sly wink at this community by having John be the one who really “sees” Molly for who/what she is while Holmes is completely blind to the obvious. Throw in fact that although he is tuned into Molly, he is completely oblivious to what is going on in his own established relationship, and it’s hard not to see the writers having a bit of perverse fun here.

bride

The other place where they play, in rather fascinating ways, is with the idea of the textual, canonical Sherlock. And here is where things get much more subversive.

The entire set-up–the idea of Sherlock sinking into his drug-induced mind palace to solve a century-old crime to help him understand how Moriarty could possibly be alive after clearly blowing the back of his head off—is Holmes essentially creating another version of himself, a Victorian one. But in doing so and retreating to his own subconscious, he frees himself to confront a reality of his recent life and the writers use this to explore that essential question more generally associated with Moffat’s other property: Who is this guy, really?

Sherlock started as a character in London newspaper serials, told from a point of view as though he actually lived and worked in the same place and time as those who were reading about him. Through many incarnations, other things have been grafted onto his character—the deer-stalker cap, the Calabash pipe, “Elementary, my dear Watson’—none of these appear in the original stories but they are as much a part of what we think of Sherlock as any of the things that were in those stories…and maybe even more so.

But regardless of that, we still think of those stories as the Bible for Sherlock—the Baker Street Irregulars, the Sherlockian literary group, actually refers to them as the “Sacred Writings.” And anyone who wants to adapt the character of Holmes would be unwise not to be quite familiar with those stories.

Mary

So when Gatiss and Moffat repeatedly have Benedict’s Sherlock explaining himself to Watson and others only to have Watson point out that what Holmes has just said is not his own words or feelings but the literary invention of Watson himself as published in those stories in the Strand—and John implies that even those are heavily fictionalized—we understand that even if we think we know who this character is, he himself does not. He is a fictional character forced to come to terms with his own fictionality, at the very same time that Gatiss/Moffat are also calling into question the centrality of the “Sacred Writings.” If we cannot go to Conan-Doyle for the final word on who Sherlock is, if Watson’s version of his fictional friend doesn’t even reflect the truth of the fiction, where on earth do we look for truth?

Is it as simple as saying that all fictions are equally truthful?

Not really. And in trying to decide exactly how I felt about this outing, I think this became a pivotal point for me because of the actual mystery (well, one of them). In the crime that Sherlock retreats to his mind palace to solve, a woman works with a group of other women to stage her own death, and then kills her husband. She then sacrifices herself so there is a body to be identified in relation to her own “original” murder, so it now appears that her husband’s death is the work of a ghost. This ghost is then used to murder other men, all guilty of some misogynist sin. Mary (through no means that is adequately explained) learns that the women are gathered and she and the boys surprise them as they mill about in robes chanting ominously and performing some sort of ritual.

Until the moment of its resolution, the mystery is about par for what we expect of Sherlock. However, in the end, when Sherlock reveals that the robed figures are women intent or wreaking gendered vengeance, the whole things unravels from the kind of tight and logical denouement we are used to seeing from the Gatiss/Moffat.

sherlock_bride09

First, while the trick with the ghost is a good one, the goal of the group is presented as a terror campaign designed to change the gender politics of the Victorian culture. This makes no sense. Terrorism only works if the behavior you are seeking to change is clearly identified. These men are being killed for crimes that remain entirely secret. They may have mistreated their wives or other women, but this does not become public knowledge and so serves as a deterrent to no one. To the rest of London, this is literally innocent men being killed by a nasty evil female ghoul.

Second, why on Earth do they find these women in a desanctified church outside London in Masonic get-up? These women are wives, mothers, maids, and morticians. They have neither the time nor the freedom of movement to be leaving the City in the middle of the night to play dress-up with chanting and torchlight and gongs for no one but themselves. It’s the very fact that they don’t that has led them to these straits.

In other words, when Moriarty points out that solving the Rigoletti murders hasn’t really helped Sherlock to figure out his own plans, he is right in more ways than one—simply because, for the first time, Sherlock has actually failed to solve the crime at all. Despite the fact that we have seen him solve a half dozen other, more complex cases, and even though it appears he has solved this one as well, he hasn’t. Not all fictions are equally truthful. Nor are they all sorted out for you.

Sherlock Special

The real question, of course, is not whether Sherlock solved the Rigoletti case, but whether he has solved the Moriarty one. He acts in the last moments with great confidence, as though he has. But that same confidence was with him minutes before in his Victorian world as he held forth on his “solution” to the Rigoletti case.  And it’s the same confidence that convinced Watson that he was no longer using.

Because Watson isn’t the only one creating fictions about the great Sherlock Holmes. Even the man himself has gotten in on the game. “Nothing made me. I made me.” Well, he’s partly right, anyway.

And why shouldn’t he get in on the action? People have been creating and recreating Sherlock for a century and a quarter at this point. If anything, we should be surprised to have waited so long for the kind of meta-work that Gatiss and Moffat put into their adaptation. What I am no longer surprised at is how essentially good it is, how satisfying, which is no small feat considering they left the primary mystery unsolved and us hanging for another year.

Thankfully, there for hundreds of Sherlocks out there to tide us over. And Gatiss/Moffat have left us with an interesting new way of looking at all those other versions.

APPIP ERROR: amazonproducts[
AccessDeniedAwsUsers|The Access Key Id AKIAIIK4RQAHE2XK6RNA is not enabled for accessing this version of Product Advertising API. Please migrate your credentials as referred here https://webservices.amazon.com/paapi5/documentation/migrating-your-product-advertising-api-account-from-your-aws-account.html.
]
(Visited 80 times, 1 visits today)

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Share on Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Amanda AbbingtonAndrew ScottBenedict CumberbatchLaura AkersLouise BrealeyMark GatissMartin FreemanRupert GravesSherlockSteven MoffatUna Stubbs

iZombie 2.10 “Method Head”
Arrow 4.09 “Dark Waters”

About The Author

monsterid
Laura Akers
Voice of the People / Firebrand

Laura Akers is a teacher by calling and a geek academic by nature. Her often too-lengthy writing and her own personal musings tend to revolve around issues of gender, sexuality, identity, politics, religion (and all the other things you’re not supposed to bring up in polite conversation) in TV/film/webseries and other narratives. You can keep up with her ramblings on these subjects by following @laurajakers

Daily Top Ten

  • Women in Horror: I Spit on Your Grave (2010)Women in Horror: I Spit on Your Grave (2010) by The Final Girl
  • Lost in Translation 219: A Second Look at The A-TeamLost in Translation 219: A Second Look at The A-Team by Scott Delahunt
  • The Hills Have Eyes (1977) vs The Hills Have Eyes (2006)The Hills Have Eyes (1977) vs The Hills Have Eyes (2006) by Corin Totin
  • Dexter 7.11 "Do You See What I See?" & 7.12 "Surprise, Motherfucker!"Dexter 7.11 “Do You See What I See?”… by Jamil Scalese
  • Fringe 4.04 "Subject 9"Fringe 4.04 “Subject 9” by Paul Brian McCoy
  • Anything Joes: Profiled - BombstrikeAnything Joes: Profiled – Bombstrike by Greg Engle
  • Nice Guys Finish First: The Death of Masculinity in Friday the 13th (2009)Nice Guys Finish First: The Death of Masculinity in… by The Final Girl
  • Better Call Saul 2.07 "Inflatable" Better Call Saul 2.07 “Inflatable” by Jamil Scalese
  • POPCORN CINEMA 23: THEY CALLED HER ONE EYE (aka, THRILLER: A Cruel Picture)POPCORN CINEMA 23: THEY CALLED HER ONE EYE (aka,… by John E. Meredith
  • Big Eyes Smart Mouth: Neji-shiki / ScrewedBig Eyes Smart Mouth: Neji-shiki / Screwed by Serdar Yegulalp
400x400 GI Joe Funko Banner

Weekly Top Ten

  • Adventure Time 6.06 “Breezy”Adventure Time 6.06 “Breezy” by Dave Hearn
  • Women in Horror: I Spit on Your Grave (2010)Women in Horror: I Spit on Your Grave (2010) by The Final Girl
  • Sick Flix: Guinea Pig 2 – Flower of Flesh and Blood (1985)Sick Flix: Guinea Pig 2 – Flower of Flesh and Blood (1985) by Corin Totin
  • The Final Girl: I Spit on Your Grave (2010)The Final Girl: I Spit on Your Grave (2010) by The Final Girl
  • Shakespeare's Macbeth (2010)Shakespeare’s Macbeth (2010) by Paul Brian McCoy
  • Advance Review: The Legend of Tarzan (2016) Blu-rayAdvance Review: The Legend of Tarzan (2016) Blu-ray by Paul Brian McCoy
  • Superman II (1980)Superman II (1980) by John Clark
  • Killer Sofa (2019)Killer Sofa (2019) by Fred L. Taulbee Jr.
  • House of Wax (2005)House of Wax (2005) by The Final Girl
  • Unnatural Selections: Two-Headed Shark Attack (2012)Unnatural Selections: Two-Headed Shark Attack (2012) by Brooke Brewer
400x400 UA Affiliate Banner

FACEBOOK

FACEBOOK

Latest Reviews

  • X (2022)

    Nate Zoebl
    April 22, 2022
  • Everything Everywhere All At Once (2022)

    Nate Zoebl
    April 15, 2022
  • The Adam Project (2022)

    Nate Zoebl
    March 16, 2022

psychodrivein

Today at https://psychodrivein.com Anything Joes: Today at https://psychodrivein.com

Anything Joes: S01E37 - G.I. Joe #12 / Three Strikes For Snake-Eyes!

It's the start of one of the most iconic Joe stories in it's entire history, and it includes the return of two pivotal characters from the past! Join Greg and Jaren as they venture into Rio Lindo to root out Cobra's next devious plot!
---
Watch Greg and Jaren at the link in our profile!

#AnythingJoes @anythingjoespod #GIJoe #MarvelComics #SnakeEyes
Today at https://psychodrivein.com Lost in Transl Today at https://psychodrivein.com

Lost in Translation 412: Good Omens (2014 BBC Radio Dramatisation)

Good Omens: The Nice and Accurate Prophecies of Agnes Nutter, Witch was first published in 1990 and was a comedy about Revelations and Armageddon.
---
Read more of Scott's article at the link in our profile!

#LostInTranslation #GoodOmens #NeilGaiman #TerryPratchett #BBC #MarkHeap #PeterSerafinowicz #JimNorton #AdamThomasWright #JosieLawrence #Charlotterichie #ColinMorgan #CliveRussell #JuliaDeakin #BBCRadio
Today at https://psychodrivein.com Anything Joes: Today at https://psychodrivein.com

Anything Joes: S01E36 - Lexington Comic & Toy Convention 2022

Greg & Jaren recount their experience meeting Larry Hama at the Lexington Comic & Toy Convention 2022. Plus, the latest news, recent acquisitions, and listener mail!
---
Listen to Greg and Jaren's podcast at the link in our profile!

@anythingjoespod #AnythingJoes #GIJoe #Mezco #LarryHama
Today at https://psychodrivein.com X (2022) Ti W Today at https://psychodrivein.com

X (2022)

Ti West is a director I haven’t fully enjoyed, though I would say X is his most accomplished film to date for me. 
---
Read more of Nate's review at the link in our profile!

#X #TiWest #MiaGoth #Slasher
Today at https://psychodrivein.com Lost in Transl Today at https://psychodrivein.com

Lost in Translation 411: The Secret of Marvel's Success

The Marvel Cinematic Universe has been dominating the box office since the release of Iron Man.
---
Read more of Scott's article at the link in our profile!

#LostInTranslation #Marvel #MarvelStudios #MarvelCinematicUniverse #MCU #IronMan #Avengers #MoonKnight #WandaVision #Hawkeye #RobertDowneyJr
Today at https://psychodrivein.com EZMM 2022 Day Today at https://psychodrivein.com

EZMM 2022 Day 9: All of Us Are Dead S1 E7-12

There are enough plot threads left dangling to give us a good launching point for a future second season, but if that doesn’t happen, All of Us Are Dead can stand as a solid one-and-done.
---
Read more of Paul's review at the link in our profile!

#EZMM #EZMM2022 #EasterZombieMovieMarathon #EasterZombieMovieMarathon2022 #AllOfUsAreDead #Netflix #LeeJaiKyoo #KimNamSu #ChunSungIl #JooDongGeun #YooInSoo #ChoYiHyun #OhHyeSoo #YoonChanYoung #LeeEunSaem #YangHanYeoi #JinHoEun #HaSeungRi #SonSangYeon #zombies
Today at https://psychodrivein.com EZMM 2022 Day Today at https://psychodrivein.com

EZMM 2022 Day 8: Return of the Living Dead III (1993)

Return of the Living Dead III is, quite simply, one of the best examples of the genre.
---
Read more of Paul's review at the link in our profile!

#EZMM #EZMM2022 #EasterZombieMovieMarathon #EasterZombieMovieMarathon2022 #zombies #ReturnOfTheLivingDead3 #BasilWallace #BrianYuzna #JTrevorEdmond #KentMcCord #MelindaClarke #SarahDouglas
Today at https://psychodrivein.com EZMM 2022 Day Today at https://psychodrivein.com

EZMM 2022 Day 7: Resident Evil: Welcome to Raccoon City (2021)

While I really didn’t like Resident Evil: Welcome to Raccoon City very much, I want to give it a fair shake.
---
Read more of Paul's review at the link in our profile!

#EZMM #EZMM2022 #EasterZombieMovieMarathon #EasterZombieMovieMarathon2022 #ResidentEvil #ResidentEvilWelcomeToRaccoonCity #WelcomeToRaccoonCity #JohannesRoberts #RobbieAmell #HannahJohnKamen #TomHopper #DonalLogue #NealMcDonough #KayaScodelario #AvanJogia #MarinaMazepa
Today at https://psychodrivein.com EZMM 2022 Day Today at https://psychodrivein.com

EZMM 2022 Day 6: Kingdom: Ashin of the North (2021)

Vengeance. That’s what Ashin is doing. That’s what she’s been doing from behind the scenes all along.
---
Read more of Paul's review at the link in our profile!

#EZMM #EZMM2022 #EasterZombieMovieMarathon #EasterZombieMovieMarathon2022 #Zombies #TheKingdom #TheKingdomAshinOfTheNorth #AshinOfTheNorth #Ashin #Netflix #JunJiHyun #KimEunHee #KimRoiHa #KimSeongHun #KimShiAh #ParkByungEun
Load More... Follow on Instagram

Latest Columns

  • Anything Joes: S01E37 – G.I. Joe #12 / Three Strikes For Snake-Eyes!

    Greg Engle
    May 11, 2022
  • Lost in Translation 412: Good Omens (2014 BBC Radio Dramatisation)

    Scott Delahunt
    April 29, 2022
  • Anything Joes: S01E36 – Lexington Comic & Toy Convention 2022

    Greg Engle
    April 27, 2022

TWITTER

My Tweets

Look Who's Talking

Oliver Ghingold
Oliver Ghingold - 2/18/2022
Muppet Madness: You’re the Director
Do you still have these tapes? I've been looking everywhere for them! I loved the Interactive Vision...
white swan
white swan - 12/22/2021
The Hills Have Eyes (1977) vs The Hills Have Eyes (2006)
I enjoyed the article though I would never call brutality gorgeous.
Shawn EH
Shawn EH - 10/26/2021
13 Days of Halloween Day 12: Halloween Kills (2021)
Very disappointing, it's true. And very mean-spirited murders of nobodies. And I don't even see how...
RSSTwitterFacebookinstagramtumblr

Archives

Large_rectangle_336X280
All work on this site is Copyright © each individual writer.
  • PDI Press
    • PDI Press Catalog
    • PDI Press Writers
      • Fiction
  • Columns A-D
    • A Fistful of Dollar Comics
    • ABCs of Horror
    • All Binge… No Purge
    • Anything Joes
    • Beautiful Creatures
    • Big Eyes Smart Mouth
    • Big Sleeps and Long Goodbyes
    • Cahiers du Horror
    • Dispatches From the Field
    • Drive-In Saturday
    • Dungeons & D-Listers
  • Columns F-P
    • The Final Girl
    • First Looks… Second Thoughts
    • The Flesh is Weak
    • Innocence and Experience
    • Lost in Translation
    • Page to Screen
    • Popcorn Cinema
    • Psycho Essentials: The ’80s!
  • Columns S-Z
    • Schlock & Awe
    • Shakespeare on Film
    • Shot for Shot
    • Sick Flix
    • Unnatural Selections
    • Versus
    • Video Word Made Flesh
    • We Got Lists
    • Women in Horror
    • The Xeno File
    • Zombies 101
  • Reviews
    • Books
    • Comics
    • DVD/Blu-ray
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Series
  • Interviews
  • News
    • Trailers
  • Psychos
  • Merchandise
%d bloggers like this: